Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from El Salvador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from El Salvador
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,039,000 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.145% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 145.3 Immigrants from El Salvador.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $38,394, a difference of 23.4%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $47,973, a difference of 19.6%), and median family income ($108,830 compared to $92,545, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $54,599, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $58,226, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $81,213, a difference of 10.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Tragic $38,394 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Tragic $92,545 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Tragic $81,213 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Tragic $42,413 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Tragic $47,973 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Tragic $36,673 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $54,599 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Tragic $86,913 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Tragic $93,176 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Tragic $58,226 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 55.7%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.2%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.0% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 20.0% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.7% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 20.0% |
| Single Males | Good 12.6% | Excellent 12.6% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 22.4% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 31.2% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 19.1% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 10.7% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Average 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Fair 79.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 34.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Good 75.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.4%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (63.5% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 5.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 44.3% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.49 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 43.1% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Average 10.4% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Average 89.6% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Average 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 107.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.9% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.2% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.2% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.5% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.8% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 90.9% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 89.0% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 86.8% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 85.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Tragic 80.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 77.6% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Tragic 56.4% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Tragic 51.0% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Tragic 38.4% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Tragic 31.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 12.0% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 25.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 49.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.2% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 2.5% |