Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from El Salvador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from El Salvador

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,312,632 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 9.0 Immigrants from El Salvador.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,599, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $81,213, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $47,973, a difference of 1.5%), median earnings ($41,252 compared to $42,413, a difference of 2.8%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $38,394, a difference of 3.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$38,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$92,545
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$81,213
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$42,413
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$47,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$36,673
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,599
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$86,913
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$93,176
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$58,226
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.1%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and poverty (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.0%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
15.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.1%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.68%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 5.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
44.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
36.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Average
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 123.0%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.34%), associate's degree (38.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
94.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
93.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
90.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
90.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
89.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
86.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
85.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
83.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
80.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
77.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
56.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
38.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.0%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from El Salvador
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.5%