Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from El Salvador
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from El Salvador
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,703,291 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 2.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 34.7% | 95.9% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 15.6% |
| Median | 15.3% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |