Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,981,786 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 94.9 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $38,394, a difference of 32.6%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $47,973, a difference of 28.0%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $92,545, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $54,599, a difference of 5.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $58,226, a difference of 10.4%), and median household income ($93,602 compared to $81,213, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 50.1%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (62.0% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 109.1%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 68.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.5%).