Choctaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,800,495 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.5 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 23.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,599, a difference of 20.1%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $81,213, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $47,973, a difference of 0.51%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $42,413, a difference of 5.3%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $38,394, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.4%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 35.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.2%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.49, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.86%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 113.9%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and high school diploma (87.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.15%), associate's degree (37.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 72.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 20.4%).