Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,385,666 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.840% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 840.2 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $62,364, a difference of 4.2%), and median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $58,324, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $41,273, a difference of 0.24%), median household income ($92,029 compared to $90,907, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($50,192 compared to $49,463, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.59%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.7%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.9%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.53%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.7%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.3%), college, under 1 year (69.1% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and college, 1 year or more (63.1% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (50.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%).