Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,216,460 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.259% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 259.0 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $48,164, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $54,487, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $100,534, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $106,470, a difference of 0.29%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $41,273, a difference of 0.72%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $62,364, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.61%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.25%).