Crow vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,559,034 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.900. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.114% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 114.4 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $48,164, a difference of 51.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $106,470, a difference of 43.4%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $109,418, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,487, a difference of 15.9%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $41,273, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $62,364, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 98.1%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 94.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.5%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 239.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 210.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 210.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.5%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 36.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.29%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.1%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 63.2%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%).