Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Brazil

Fair
Good
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,311,137 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Brazil.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $48,164, a difference of 33.8%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $90,907, a difference of 30.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $106,470, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $62,364, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,487, a difference of 19.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$48,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$109,418
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$90,907
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$58,324
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$41,273
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,487
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$100,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$106,470
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Excellent
$62,364
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 47.1%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.51%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.7%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.8%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.9%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.7%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.60%), currently married (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
29.6%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.7%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 64.4%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
61.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
50.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.2%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Brazil
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%