Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,688,651 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.507% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 507.4 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $54,487, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $100,534, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($108,830 compared to $109,418, a difference of 0.54%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $41,273, a difference of 0.62%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $49,463, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.44%), single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.1%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.0%), college, under 1 year (68.9% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and college, 1 year or more (63.3% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.25%).