Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,096,367 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 40.1 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $101,170, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $63,187, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,717, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $45,933, a difference of 4.4%), and per capita income ($39,827 compared to $41,678, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 10.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.020%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.2%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.29%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%).