Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Guamanians/Chamorros

Fair
Fair
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,674,018 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 15.0 Guamanians/Chamorros.
Choctaw Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $86,255, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $101,170, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $93,569, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.3%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $53,661, a difference of 12.4%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $45,933, a difference of 14.1%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income
Income MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$41,678
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Fair
$101,061
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Good
$86,255
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Fair
$45,933
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Fair
$53,661
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Poor
$38,717
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$53,423
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Fair
$93,569
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Good
$101,170
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$63,187
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Fair
26.0%

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.5%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 39.4%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.6%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Good
12.1%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Average
11.7%

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
38.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
81.6%

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 16.6%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
66.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
29.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Average
31.6%

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.15%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
60.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
23.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.1%

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.8%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
43.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.5%).
Choctaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability
Disability MetricChoctawGuamanian/Chamorro
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%