Immigrants from Oceania vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,853,010 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $41,678, a difference of 8.5%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $101,061, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $93,569, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,423, a difference of 0.48%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $63,187, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.62%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.6%).