Pima vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,692,644 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $101,170, a difference of 37.9%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $86,255, a difference of 36.3%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,678, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,423, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,717, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $93,569, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 131.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 108.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 131.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 108.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 102.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 62.7%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.9%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 77.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 49.3%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 44.8%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 52.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.6%).