Immigrants from Latvia vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,238,032 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.074% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 73.7 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $41,678, a difference of 22.2%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $53,661, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $101,061, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $63,187, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,423, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.19%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.5%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.72%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 46.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 53.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.9%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.72%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 4.2%).