Hungarian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,347,785 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.4%), per capita income ($45,426 compared to $47,248, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $40,825, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,920 compared to $86,635, a difference of 0.33%), median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $57,572, a difference of 0.46%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $61,093, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.9%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.48%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.7%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (64.9% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.15%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.9%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), male disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.66%).