Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,733,912 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to an increase of 82.3 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $49,113, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $61,093, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,425 compared to $86,635, a difference of 0.24%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,849 compared to $99,449, a difference of 0.61%), and median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $57,572, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 68.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 49.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.54%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 39.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 19.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.28%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 150.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 52.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 22.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 50.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 88.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (50.3% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.77%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.2%).