Immigrants from France vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,543,108 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 56.3 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $47,248, a difference of 15.5%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $107,502, a difference of 11.7%), and median household income ($96,743 compared to $86,635, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,257 compared to $99,449, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $40,825, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 6.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.3% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 0.35%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.1%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.36%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.2%).