Romanian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,243,545 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 52.7 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $49,113, a difference of 9.2%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $86,635, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $102,777, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $40,825, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $47,248, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.6%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.63%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), college, 1 year or more (62.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.50%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.3%).