Czechoslovakian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,414,032 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 77.1 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $47,248, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $40,825, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $99,449, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,093, a difference of 0.85%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $102,777, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $86,635, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.7%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.06, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.3%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.74%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%).