Hungarian vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,205,967 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 15.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,426 compared to $52,074, a difference of 14.6%), median family income ($105,609 compared to $118,440, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($86,920 compared to $96,490, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $53,739, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $66,891, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.3%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.8%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.2%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.0%).