Pima vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,864,381 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 23.7 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,074, a difference of 69.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $113,533, a difference of 54.7%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $118,440, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,739, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,308, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $107,912, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 164.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 164.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 126.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 121.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 74.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.71%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 98.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 89.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 75.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 61.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.9%).