Canadian vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,655,126 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 204.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $52,074, a difference of 13.6%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $118,440, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $107,912, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.090%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $66,891, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.16%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.1%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.2%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.1%).