Luxembourger vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,131,328 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.270% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 270.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $52,074, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $96,490, a difference of 11.7%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $62,857, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,739, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $43,308, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.2%), male poverty (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.47%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.7%), currently married (49.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 88.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Australian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.4%).