Swedish vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,476,236 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 25.3 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,750 compared to $52,074, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $43,308, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $62,857, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $53,739, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $66,891, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.46%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.5%), currently married (50.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple households (49.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.76%).