Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

15.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Mulhall 1.9% 34.1% (-32.2)#1 35.2% (-33.3)#200
2. Marshall 2.5% 34.1% (-31.5)#2 35.2% (-32.7)#369
3. Brushy 2.6% 34.1% (-31.5)#3 35.2% (-32.6)#386
4. Simms 3.0% 34.1% (-31.1)#4 35.2% (-32.2)#497
5. Goltry 3.0% 34.1% (-31.1)#5 35.2% (-32.2)#499
6. Foss 3.0% 34.1% (-31.0)#6 35.2% (-32.2)#517
7. Hickory 3.0% 34.1% (-31.0)#7 35.2% (-32.2)#518
8. Nash 3.1% 34.1% (-31.0)#8 35.2% (-32.1)#536
9. Loco 3.2% 34.1% (-30.8)#9 35.2% (-32.0)#586
10. Deer Creek 3.4% 34.1% (-30.6)#10 35.2% (-31.7)#658
11. Sequoyah 3.6% 34.1% (-30.5)#11 35.2% (-31.6)#699
12. Forest Park 3.7% 34.1% (-30.3)#12 35.2% (-31.5)#752
13. Manchester 3.8% 34.1% (-30.3)#13 35.2% (-31.4)#772
14. Short 4.0% 34.1% (-30.0)#14 35.2% (-31.1)#854
15. Cookson 4.1% 34.1% (-29.9)#15 35.2% (-31.0)#879
16. Nichols Hills 4.1% 34.1% (-29.9)#16 35.2% (-31.0)#880
17. Iron Post 4.3% 34.1% (-29.7)#17 35.2% (-30.8)#953
18. Titanic 4.5% 34.1% (-29.5)#18 35.2% (-30.6)#1,024
19. Flint Creek 4.7% 34.1% (-29.4)#19 35.2% (-30.5)#1,090
20. Paradise Hill 4.8% 34.1% (-29.3)#20 35.2% (-30.4)#1,122
21. Utica 4.8% 34.1% (-29.3)#21 35.2% (-30.4)#1,128
22. White Oak 4.8% 34.1% (-29.2)#22 35.2% (-30.3)#1,155
23. Smith Village 4.9% 34.1% (-29.2)#23 35.2% (-30.3)#1,177
24. Cornish 4.9% 34.1% (-29.1)#24 35.2% (-30.3)#1,191
25. Hallett 5.0% 34.1% (-29.1)#25 35.2% (-30.2)#1,226
26. Clearview 5.0% 34.1% (-29.1)#26 35.2% (-30.2)#1,227
27. Lebanon 5.4% 34.1% (-28.7)#27 35.2% (-29.8)#1,391
28. Hochatown 5.4% 34.1% (-28.6)#28 35.2% (-29.7)#1,400
29. Akins 5.4% 34.1% (-28.6)#29 35.2% (-29.7)#1,407
30. Taylor Ferry 5.6% 34.1% (-28.5)#30 35.2% (-29.6)#1,456
31. Optima 5.6% 34.1% (-28.5)#31 35.2% (-29.6)#1,460
32. Peckham 5.9% 34.1% (-28.2)#32 35.2% (-29.3)#1,603
33. Goldsby 6.1% 34.1% (-28.0)#33 35.2% (-29.1)#1,663
34. Cayuga 6.1% 34.1% (-27.9)#34 35.2% (-29.1)#1,693
35. Piedmont 6.2% 34.1% (-27.8)#35 35.2% (-29.0)#1,719
36. Tuskahoma 6.2% 34.1% (-27.8)#36 35.2% (-28.9)#1,749
37. Tribbey 6.3% 34.1% (-27.8)#37 35.2% (-28.9)#1,761
38. Johnson 6.3% 34.1% (-27.8)#38 35.2% (-28.9)#1,766
39. Rentiesville 6.4% 34.1% (-27.7)#39 35.2% (-28.8)#1,799
40. Wardville 6.4% 34.1% (-27.7)#40 35.2% (-28.8)#1,800
41. Alderson 6.5% 34.1% (-27.6)#41 35.2% (-28.7)#1,844
42. Bradley 6.5% 34.1% (-27.6)#42 35.2% (-28.7)#1,847
43. Grand Lake Towne 6.6% 34.1% (-27.5)#43 35.2% (-28.6)#1,877
44. Kremlin 6.8% 34.1% (-27.2)#44 35.2% (-28.4)#1,977
45. Kildare 6.9% 34.1% (-27.2)#45 35.2% (-28.3)#2,006
46. Breckenridge 7.0% 34.1% (-27.0)#46 35.2% (-28.2)#2,063
47. Meno 7.1% 34.1% (-26.9)#47 35.2% (-28.0)#2,128
48. Gerty 7.1% 34.1% (-26.9)#48 35.2% (-28.0)#2,141
49. Empire City 7.2% 34.1% (-26.8)#49 35.2% (-28.0)#2,166
50. Redbird Smith 7.2% 34.1% (-26.8)#50 35.2% (-27.9)#2,174
51. Norge 7.2% 34.1% (-26.8)#51 35.2% (-27.9)#2,180
52. Remy 7.3% 34.1% (-26.8)#52 35.2% (-27.9)#2,200
53. Bell 7.3% 34.1% (-26.7)#53 35.2% (-27.9)#2,213
54. Cowlington 7.5% 34.1% (-26.6)#54 35.2% (-27.7)#2,301
55. Braman 7.6% 34.1% (-26.5)#55 35.2% (-27.6)#2,337
56. Briartown 7.6% 34.1% (-26.5)#56 35.2% (-27.6)#2,338
57. Pink 7.7% 34.1% (-26.4)#57 35.2% (-27.5)#2,367
58. Limestone 7.7% 34.1% (-26.3)#58 35.2% (-27.5)#2,421
59. Briggs 7.7% 34.1% (-26.3)#59 35.2% (-27.5)#2,423
60. Leach 7.8% 34.1% (-26.3)#60 35.2% (-27.4)#2,447
61. North Enid 7.9% 34.1% (-26.2)#61 35.2% (-27.3)#2,507
62. Pin Oak Acres 7.9% 34.1% (-26.2)#62 35.2% (-27.3)#2,508
63. River Bottom 8.0% 34.1% (-26.1)#63 35.2% (-27.2)#2,522
64. Leonard 8.0% 34.1% (-26.1)#64 35.2% (-27.2)#2,538
65. Norwood 8.0% 34.1% (-26.0)#65 35.2% (-27.2)#2,554
66. Summit 8.1% 34.1% (-26.0)#66 35.2% (-27.1)#2,595
67. Keefton 8.5% 34.1% (-25.6)#67 35.2% (-26.7)#2,761
68. Forgan 8.6% 34.1% (-25.5)#68 35.2% (-26.6)#2,804
69. Willow 8.6% 34.1% (-25.5)#69 35.2% (-26.6)#2,807
70. Ingalls 8.7% 34.1% (-25.4)#70 35.2% (-26.5)#2,877
71. Hammon 8.9% 34.1% (-25.2)#71 35.2% (-26.3)#2,986
72. Cleora 8.9% 34.1% (-25.1)#72 35.2% (-26.3)#2,990
73. Preston 8.9% 34.1% (-25.1)#73 35.2% (-26.3)#3,000
74. Shady Grove Cdp Cherokee County 9.3% 34.1% (-24.8)#74 35.2% (-25.9)#3,203
75. Copan 9.3% 34.1% (-24.8)#75 35.2% (-25.9)#3,207
76. Waukomis 9.4% 34.1% (-24.7)#76 35.2% (-25.8)#3,242
77. Little Rock 9.4% 34.1% (-24.6)#77 35.2% (-25.7)#3,280
78. Yeager 9.4% 34.1% (-24.6)#78 35.2% (-25.7)#3,282
79. St Louis 9.5% 34.1% (-24.5)#79 35.2% (-25.7)#3,342
80. Indianola 9.6% 34.1% (-24.4)#80 35.2% (-25.6)#3,380
81. Kaw City 9.6% 34.1% (-24.4)#81 35.2% (-25.5)#3,397
82. Oakwood 9.7% 34.1% (-24.4)#82 35.2% (-25.5)#3,414
83. Leon 9.8% 34.1% (-24.3)#83 35.2% (-25.4)#3,452
84. Dacoma 10.0% 34.1% (-24.1)#84 35.2% (-25.2)#3,584
85. Drummond 10.1% 34.1% (-24.0)#85 35.2% (-25.1)#3,619
86. Cleo Springs 10.3% 34.1% (-23.8)#86 35.2% (-24.9)#3,743
87. Stoney Point 10.3% 34.1% (-23.7)#87 35.2% (-24.8)#3,772
88. Little Ponderosa 10.4% 34.1% (-23.7)#88 35.2% (-24.8)#3,783
89. Castle 10.4% 34.1% (-23.7)#89 35.2% (-24.8)#3,787
90. Choctaw 10.4% 34.1% (-23.7)#90 35.2% (-24.8)#3,796
91. Teresita 10.4% 34.1% (-23.6)#91 35.2% (-24.8)#3,802
92. Jet 10.4% 34.1% (-23.6)#92 35.2% (-24.7)#3,819
93. Verdigris 10.5% 34.1% (-23.6)#93 35.2% (-24.7)#3,841
94. Longtown 10.5% 34.1% (-23.5)#94 35.2% (-24.7)#3,849
95. Fargo 10.6% 34.1% (-23.4)#95 35.2% (-24.6)#3,904
96. Carlisle 10.7% 34.1% (-23.4)#96 35.2% (-24.5)#3,928
97. Eldorado 10.7% 34.1% (-23.3)#97 35.2% (-24.4)#3,980
98. Mountain View 10.8% 34.1% (-23.3)#98 35.2% (-24.4)#4,005
99. Justice 11.0% 34.1% (-23.1)#99 35.2% (-24.2)#4,126
100. Rosston 11.1% 34.1% (-22.9)#100 35.2% (-24.1)#4,198

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma are:
#1
1.9%
#2
2.5%
#3
2.6%
#4
3.0%
#5
3.0%
#6
3.0%
#7
3.0%
#8
3.1%
#9
3.2%
#10
3.4%
What city has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Mulhall has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma with 1.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 34.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.