Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska

15.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Verdon 1.1% 33.5% (-32.4)#1 35.2% (-34.1)#68
2. Naponee 1.4% 33.5% (-32.1)#2 35.2% (-33.8)#98
3. Alexandria 1.9% 33.5% (-31.6)#3 35.2% (-33.3)#196
4. Prosser 2.1% 33.5% (-31.4)#4 35.2% (-33.1)#238
5. Leshara 2.5% 33.5% (-31.0)#5 35.2% (-32.7)#345
6. Washington 2.6% 33.5% (-30.9)#6 35.2% (-32.6)#383
7. Guide Rock 2.6% 33.5% (-30.9)#7 35.2% (-32.6)#390
8. Kilgore 2.6% 33.5% (-30.8)#8 35.2% (-32.6)#403
9. Ruskin 2.7% 33.5% (-30.7)#9 35.2% (-32.4)#425
10. St Helena 2.8% 33.5% (-30.7)#10 35.2% (-32.4)#436
11. Lawrence 2.9% 33.5% (-30.5)#11 35.2% (-32.3)#477
12. Wilsonville 3.0% 33.5% (-30.4)#12 35.2% (-32.2)#522
13. Waco 3.2% 33.5% (-30.3)#13 35.2% (-32.0)#563
14. Octavia 3.3% 33.5% (-30.2)#14 35.2% (-31.9)#607
15. Fordyce 3.7% 33.5% (-29.8)#15 35.2% (-31.5)#738
16. Duncan 3.9% 33.5% (-29.6)#16 35.2% (-31.3)#807
17. Brock 4.1% 33.5% (-29.4)#17 35.2% (-31.1)#862
18. Goehner 4.2% 33.5% (-29.3)#18 35.2% (-31.0)#904
19. Newport 4.3% 33.5% (-29.1)#19 35.2% (-30.8)#952
20. Tobias 4.4% 33.5% (-29.0)#20 35.2% (-30.7)#986
21. Alvo 4.5% 33.5% (-28.9)#21 35.2% (-30.6)#1,032
22. Lewiston 4.8% 33.5% (-28.7)#22 35.2% (-30.4)#1,130
23. Rockville 4.8% 33.5% (-28.6)#23 35.2% (-30.3)#1,156
24. Norman 5.0% 33.5% (-28.5)#24 35.2% (-30.2)#1,228
25. Cushing 5.3% 33.5% (-28.2)#25 35.2% (-29.9)#1,333
26. Wynot 5.4% 33.5% (-28.0)#26 35.2% (-29.7)#1,399
27. Madrid 5.6% 33.5% (-27.9)#27 35.2% (-29.6)#1,461
28. Garrison 5.6% 33.5% (-27.9)#28 35.2% (-29.6)#1,473
29. Blue Springs 5.7% 33.5% (-27.8)#29 35.2% (-29.5)#1,514
30. Staplehurst 5.7% 33.5% (-27.7)#30 35.2% (-29.5)#1,537
31. Woodland Park 5.9% 33.5% (-27.6)#31 35.2% (-29.3)#1,584
32. Eagle 5.9% 33.5% (-27.6)#32 35.2% (-29.3)#1,585
33. Beaver Crossing 6.0% 33.5% (-27.4)#33 35.2% (-29.1)#1,661
34. Berwyn 6.1% 33.5% (-27.4)#34 35.2% (-29.1)#1,673
35. Belmar 6.1% 33.5% (-27.3)#35 35.2% (-29.1)#1,695
36. Republican City 6.2% 33.5% (-27.3)#36 35.2% (-29.0)#1,702
37. Bloomington 6.7% 33.5% (-26.8)#37 35.2% (-28.5)#1,917
38. Bruning 6.9% 33.5% (-26.6)#38 35.2% (-28.3)#1,989
39. Hubbell 6.9% 33.5% (-26.6)#39 35.2% (-28.3)#2,008
40. Jackson 6.9% 33.5% (-26.5)#40 35.2% (-28.2)#2,028
41. Dixon 7.0% 33.5% (-26.5)#41 35.2% (-28.2)#2,047
42. Danbury 7.0% 33.5% (-26.5)#42 35.2% (-28.2)#2,048
43. Elmwood 7.0% 33.5% (-26.5)#43 35.2% (-28.2)#2,053
44. Cedar Rapids 7.1% 33.5% (-26.4)#44 35.2% (-28.1)#2,099
45. Barneston 7.1% 33.5% (-26.3)#45 35.2% (-28.0)#2,135
46. Bladen 7.2% 33.5% (-26.2)#46 35.2% (-28.0)#2,168
47. Endicott 7.6% 33.5% (-25.9)#47 35.2% (-27.6)#2,342
48. Cedar Creek 7.6% 33.5% (-25.9)#48 35.2% (-27.6)#2,346
49. Miller 7.7% 33.5% (-25.8)#49 35.2% (-27.5)#2,398
50. Sholes 7.7% 33.5% (-25.8)#50 35.2% (-27.5)#2,413
51. Pickrell 7.9% 33.5% (-25.6)#51 35.2% (-27.3)#2,488
52. Marquette 7.9% 33.5% (-25.5)#52 35.2% (-27.3)#2,512
53. Upland 8.0% 33.5% (-25.5)#53 35.2% (-27.2)#2,541
54. Primrose 8.0% 33.5% (-25.5)#54 35.2% (-27.2)#2,549
55. Riverdale 8.1% 33.5% (-25.4)#55 35.2% (-27.1)#2,579
56. Shickley 8.2% 33.5% (-25.3)#56 35.2% (-27.0)#2,618
57. Funk 8.2% 33.5% (-25.3)#57 35.2% (-27.0)#2,639
58. Bennet 8.3% 33.5% (-25.1)#58 35.2% (-26.9)#2,678
59. Filley 8.3% 33.5% (-25.1)#59 35.2% (-26.9)#2,700
60. Naper 8.5% 33.5% (-25.0)#60 35.2% (-26.7)#2,757
61. Battle Creek 8.5% 33.5% (-25.0)#61 35.2% (-26.7)#2,776
62. Bee 8.6% 33.5% (-24.9)#62 35.2% (-26.6)#2,821
63. Walton 8.7% 33.5% (-24.8)#63 35.2% (-26.5)#2,855
64. Mcgrew 8.9% 33.5% (-24.6)#64 35.2% (-26.3)#2,982
65. Hildreth 8.9% 33.5% (-24.5)#65 35.2% (-26.2)#3,013
66. Johnson 9.0% 33.5% (-24.4)#66 35.2% (-26.2)#3,065
67. Howells 9.1% 33.5% (-24.4)#67 35.2% (-26.1)#3,084
68. Belden 9.1% 33.5% (-24.4)#68 35.2% (-26.1)#3,117
69. Mclean 9.1% 33.5% (-24.4)#69 35.2% (-26.1)#3,119
70. Preston 9.1% 33.5% (-24.4)#70 35.2% (-26.1)#3,131
71. Chambers 9.1% 33.5% (-24.3)#71 35.2% (-26.0)#3,150
72. Carroll 9.3% 33.5% (-24.2)#72 35.2% (-25.9)#3,204
73. Phillips 9.3% 33.5% (-24.1)#73 35.2% (-25.9)#3,225
74. Trumbull 9.5% 33.5% (-23.9)#74 35.2% (-25.7)#3,328
75. Palmyra 9.5% 33.5% (-23.9)#75 35.2% (-25.6)#3,353
76. St Libory 9.6% 33.5% (-23.9)#76 35.2% (-25.6)#3,365
77. Prague 9.6% 33.5% (-23.8)#77 35.2% (-25.6)#3,390
78. Glenwood 9.9% 33.5% (-23.6)#78 35.2% (-25.3)#3,497
79. Axtell 10.0% 33.5% (-23.5)#79 35.2% (-25.2)#3,554
80. Henderson 10.0% 33.5% (-23.5)#80 35.2% (-25.2)#3,556
81. Douglas 10.0% 33.5% (-23.5)#81 35.2% (-25.2)#3,575
82. Harbine 10.0% 33.5% (-23.5)#82 35.2% (-25.2)#3,592
83. Crofton 10.1% 33.5% (-23.3)#83 35.2% (-25.1)#3,661
84. Rising City 10.2% 33.5% (-23.2)#84 35.2% (-24.9)#3,717
85. Davey 10.4% 33.5% (-23.0)#85 35.2% (-24.7)#3,822
86. Waterbury 10.5% 33.5% (-22.9)#86 35.2% (-24.7)#3,862
87. Merriman 10.6% 33.5% (-22.8)#87 35.2% (-24.5)#3,918
88. Nelson 10.7% 33.5% (-22.7)#88 35.2% (-24.5)#3,960
89. Henry 10.7% 33.5% (-22.7)#89 35.2% (-24.5)#3,973
90. Lindsay 10.9% 33.5% (-22.6)#90 35.2% (-24.3)#4,038
91. Palisade 11.0% 33.5% (-22.5)#91 35.2% (-24.2)#4,106
92. Manley 11.0% 33.5% (-22.4)#92 35.2% (-24.2)#4,130
93. Dalton 11.0% 33.5% (-22.4)#93 35.2% (-24.1)#4,138
94. Dawson 11.1% 33.5% (-22.3)#94 35.2% (-24.1)#4,178
95. Long Pine 11.2% 33.5% (-22.3)#95 35.2% (-24.0)#4,234
96. Lynch 11.2% 33.5% (-22.2)#96 35.2% (-24.0)#4,244
97. Union 11.3% 33.5% (-22.1)#97 35.2% (-23.9)#4,281
98. Royal 11.4% 33.5% (-22.0)#98 35.2% (-23.8)#4,352
99. Roseland 11.5% 33.5% (-22.0)#99 35.2% (-23.7)#4,364
100. Western 11.5% 33.5% (-21.9)#100 35.2% (-23.6)#4,415

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska are:
#1
1.1%
#2
1.4%
#3
1.9%
#4
2.1%
#5
2.5%
#6
2.6%
#7
2.6%
#8
2.6%
#9
2.7%
#10
2.8%
What city has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska?
Verdon has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska with 1.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska is 33.5%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.