Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota

20.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Frankfort 1.6% 31.6% (-30.0)#1 35.2% (-33.6)#137
2. Reliance 2.5% 31.6% (-29.1)#2 35.2% (-32.7)#354
3. Buffalo Gap 2.8% 31.6% (-28.7)#3 35.2% (-32.4)#448
4. Dallas 2.9% 31.6% (-28.7)#4 35.2% (-32.3)#462
5. La Bolt 2.9% 31.6% (-28.7)#5 35.2% (-32.3)#463
6. Hecla 3.0% 31.6% (-28.6)#6 35.2% (-32.2)#493
7. Claire City 3.0% 31.6% (-28.5)#7 35.2% (-32.2)#521
8. Blackhawk 3.4% 31.6% (-28.2)#8 35.2% (-31.8)#636
9. Strandburg 3.4% 31.6% (-28.1)#9 35.2% (-31.7)#660
10. Corona 3.7% 31.6% (-27.9)#10 35.2% (-31.5)#743
11. Mina 3.7% 31.6% (-27.8)#11 35.2% (-31.5)#750
12. Meadow View Addition 3.9% 31.6% (-27.7)#12 35.2% (-31.3)#812
13. Alpena 4.1% 31.6% (-27.4)#13 35.2% (-31.1)#874
14. Conde 4.2% 31.6% (-27.3)#14 35.2% (-31.0)#914
15. Frederick 5.0% 31.6% (-26.6)#15 35.2% (-30.2)#1,206
16. Twin Brooks 5.6% 31.6% (-26.0)#16 35.2% (-29.6)#1,475
17. Roscoe 5.7% 31.6% (-25.9)#17 35.2% (-29.5)#1,519
18. Oelrichs 5.8% 31.6% (-25.8)#18 35.2% (-29.4)#1,558
19. Badger 5.9% 31.6% (-25.7)#19 35.2% (-29.3)#1,590
20. Oahe Acres 6.1% 31.6% (-25.5)#20 35.2% (-29.1)#1,667
21. Grenville 6.1% 31.6% (-25.5)#21 35.2% (-29.1)#1,675
22. Cavour 6.2% 31.6% (-25.4)#22 35.2% (-29.0)#1,701
23. Long Lake 6.2% 31.6% (-25.3)#23 35.2% (-28.9)#1,753
24. Rapid Valley 6.3% 31.6% (-25.2)#24 35.2% (-28.9)#1,772
25. Worthing 6.4% 31.6% (-25.2)#25 35.2% (-28.8)#1,786
26. Wentworth 6.5% 31.6% (-25.1)#26 35.2% (-28.7)#1,845
27. Central City 6.6% 31.6% (-25.0)#27 35.2% (-28.6)#1,878
28. Chelsea 6.7% 31.6% (-24.9)#28 35.2% (-28.5)#1,922
29. Geddes 6.9% 31.6% (-24.6)#29 35.2% (-28.2)#2,033
30. Renner Corner 7.2% 31.6% (-24.4)#30 35.2% (-28.0)#2,164
31. Hazel 7.3% 31.6% (-24.2)#31 35.2% (-27.9)#2,215
32. Warner 7.4% 31.6% (-24.2)#32 35.2% (-27.8)#2,253
33. New Witten 7.5% 31.6% (-24.0)#33 35.2% (-27.6)#2,324
34. Hosmer 7.7% 31.6% (-23.9)#34 35.2% (-27.5)#2,384
35. Claremont 7.7% 31.6% (-23.9)#35 35.2% (-27.5)#2,406
36. Morristown 7.7% 31.6% (-23.9)#36 35.2% (-27.5)#2,409
37. Davis 7.8% 31.6% (-23.7)#37 35.2% (-27.3)#2,473
38. Wasta 8.1% 31.6% (-23.5)#38 35.2% (-27.1)#2,599
39. Cresbard 8.2% 31.6% (-23.4)#39 35.2% (-27.0)#2,620
40. Lebanon 8.3% 31.6% (-23.2)#40 35.2% (-26.9)#2,706
41. Turton 8.3% 31.6% (-23.2)#41 35.2% (-26.9)#2,711
42. Dolton 8.3% 31.6% (-23.2)#42 35.2% (-26.9)#2,713
43. Dimock 8.6% 31.6% (-23.0)#43 35.2% (-26.6)#2,811
44. Glenham 8.6% 31.6% (-22.9)#44 35.2% (-26.6)#2,833
45. Fairfax 8.8% 31.6% (-22.7)#45 35.2% (-26.4)#2,949
46. Brentford 8.9% 31.6% (-22.7)#46 35.2% (-26.3)#2,983
47. Lake Madison 9.0% 31.6% (-22.5)#47 35.2% (-26.2)#3,068
48. Johnson Siding 9.1% 31.6% (-22.5)#48 35.2% (-26.1)#3,083
49. Utica 9.1% 31.6% (-22.5)#49 35.2% (-26.1)#3,125
50. Goodwin 9.2% 31.6% (-22.3)#50 35.2% (-26.0)#3,184
51. Running Water 9.4% 31.6% (-22.1)#51 35.2% (-25.7)#3,285
52. Ashton 9.5% 31.6% (-22.0)#52 35.2% (-25.7)#3,335
53. Fairburn 9.5% 31.6% (-22.0)#53 35.2% (-25.7)#3,347
54. Crooks 9.5% 31.6% (-22.0)#54 35.2% (-25.6)#3,354
55. Henry 9.9% 31.6% (-21.6)#55 35.2% (-25.3)#3,538
56. Lake City 10.0% 31.6% (-21.6)#56 35.2% (-25.2)#3,596
57. Green Valley 10.2% 31.6% (-21.3)#57 35.2% (-25.0)#3,706
58. Tolstoy 10.5% 31.6% (-21.0)#58 35.2% (-24.7)#3,864
59. Hurley 11.0% 31.6% (-20.6)#59 35.2% (-24.2)#4,100
60. Fulton 11.1% 31.6% (-20.5)#60 35.2% (-24.1)#4,190
61. Onida 11.2% 31.6% (-20.4)#61 35.2% (-24.0)#4,217
62. Newell 11.5% 31.6% (-20.1)#62 35.2% (-23.7)#4,382
63. Oldham 11.6% 31.6% (-20.0)#63 35.2% (-23.6)#4,440
64. Lesterville 11.7% 31.6% (-19.9)#64 35.2% (-23.5)#4,489
65. Anderson 11.7% 31.6% (-19.9)#65 35.2% (-23.5)#4,498
66. Raymond 11.8% 31.6% (-19.8)#66 35.2% (-23.4)#4,554
67. Pierpont 12.3% 31.6% (-19.3)#67 35.2% (-22.9)#4,839
68. Vivian 12.5% 31.6% (-19.1)#68 35.2% (-22.7)#4,992
69. Lane 12.5% 31.6% (-19.1)#69 35.2% (-22.7)#4,999
70. Jefferson 12.8% 31.6% (-18.8)#70 35.2% (-22.4)#5,163
71. Astoria 12.8% 31.6% (-18.7)#71 35.2% (-22.4)#5,170
72. Blucksberg Mountain 12.9% 31.6% (-18.7)#72 35.2% (-22.3)#5,199
73. Kennebec 13.0% 31.6% (-18.6)#73 35.2% (-22.2)#5,276
74. Bradley 13.0% 31.6% (-18.5)#74 35.2% (-22.1)#5,329
75. Bushnell 13.0% 31.6% (-18.5)#75 35.2% (-22.1)#5,335
76. Pringle 13.3% 31.6% (-18.2)#76 35.2% (-21.9)#5,490
77. Naples 13.3% 31.6% (-18.2)#77 35.2% (-21.9)#5,499
78. Emery 13.8% 31.6% (-17.8)#78 35.2% (-21.4)#5,752
79. Pukwana 13.8% 31.6% (-17.8)#79 35.2% (-21.4)#5,777
80. Egan 13.8% 31.6% (-17.8)#80 35.2% (-21.4)#5,779
81. Yale 13.9% 31.6% (-17.7)#81 35.2% (-21.3)#5,862
82. Columbia 13.9% 31.6% (-17.6)#82 35.2% (-21.3)#5,871
83. Edgemont 14.0% 31.6% (-17.6)#83 35.2% (-21.2)#5,926
84. Mission Hill 14.5% 31.6% (-17.1)#84 35.2% (-20.7)#6,220
85. Artesian 14.7% 31.6% (-16.9)#85 35.2% (-20.5)#6,365
86. Highmore 14.8% 31.6% (-16.7)#86 35.2% (-20.4)#6,444
87. Harrisburg 14.9% 31.6% (-16.7)#87 35.2% (-20.3)#6,478
88. Bridgewater 15.0% 31.6% (-16.6)#88 35.2% (-20.2)#6,545
89. Forestburg 15.0% 31.6% (-16.6)#89 35.2% (-20.2)#6,563
90. Revillo 15.1% 31.6% (-16.5)#90 35.2% (-20.1)#6,593
91. Olivet 15.2% 31.6% (-16.4)#91 35.2% (-20.0)#6,650
92. Humboldt 15.3% 31.6% (-16.3)#92 35.2% (-19.9)#6,728
93. Spencer 15.4% 31.6% (-16.2)#93 35.2% (-19.8)#6,784
94. Iroquois 15.5% 31.6% (-16.1)#94 35.2% (-19.7)#6,840
95. Wessington 15.6% 31.6% (-16.0)#95 35.2% (-19.6)#6,869
96. Chester 15.8% 31.6% (-15.8)#96 35.2% (-19.4)#7,015
97. Carthage 15.9% 31.6% (-15.6)#97 35.2% (-19.2)#7,096
98. Florence 16.1% 31.6% (-15.5)#98 35.2% (-19.1)#7,213
99. Agar 16.4% 31.6% (-15.2)#99 35.2% (-18.8)#7,400
100. Mellette 16.4% 31.6% (-15.1)#100 35.2% (-18.8)#7,408

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota are:
#1
1.6%
#2
2.5%
#3
2.8%
#4
2.9%
#5
2.9%
#6
3.0%
#7
3.0%
#8
3.4%
#9
3.4%
#10
3.7%
What city has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota?
Frankfort has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota with 1.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in South Dakota is 31.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.