Luxembourger vs Japanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Japanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Japanese

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Japanese Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,842,719 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.259% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 259.1 Japanese.
Luxembourger Integration in Japanese Communities

Luxembourger vs Japanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 15.3%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $39,870, a difference of 14.5%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $51,473, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,528, a difference of 3.5%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $83,395, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,365, a difference of 3.9%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$39,870
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$97,288
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Fair
$83,395
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$44,825
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$51,473
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$38,528
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Good
$52,365
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Poor
$91,624
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Poor
$96,834
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$57,919
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.8%

Luxembourger vs Japanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Luxembourger vs Japanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.2%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Luxembourger vs Japanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Luxembourger vs Japanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.1%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
35.2%

Luxembourger vs Japanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 76.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Luxembourger vs Japanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 110.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
89.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
85.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
82.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
41.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
33.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Japanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.58%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.4%).
Luxembourger vs Japanese Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerJapanese
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%