Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Japanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Japanese

Good
Fair
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Japanese Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,052,632 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.983. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.608% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 607.6 Japanese.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Japanese Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.5%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $39,870, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $51,473, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $38,528, a difference of 0.54%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $83,395, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,365, a difference of 2.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$39,870
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$97,288
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Fair
$83,395
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$44,825
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$51,473
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$38,528
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Good
$52,365
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Poor
$91,624
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Poor
$96,834
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$57,919
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
23.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.1%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.85%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.35, a difference of 7.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
44.5%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
35.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 106.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
89.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
88.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
85.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
82.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
41.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
33.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.0%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Japanese Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianJapanese
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%