Immigrants from Oceania vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,108,644 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 77.8 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $39,870, a difference of 13.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $57,919, a difference of 11.2%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $97,288, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,365, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $38,528, a difference of 4.6%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $44,825, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.76%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.9%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%).