Immigrants from Belarus vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,927,199 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.114% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 114.4 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $39,870, a difference of 26.2%), median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $51,473, a difference of 21.7%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $44,825, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $52,365, a difference of 6.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $57,919, a difference of 7.3%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.1%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.1%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 37.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 77.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 62.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.4%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.4%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.4%).