Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,645,450 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 15.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $103,584, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $95,698, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($93,748 compared to $106,188, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $40,739, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $52,374, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $48,041, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.49%), family households (62.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.7%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.64%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.0%).