Austrian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,938,097 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to a decrease of 11.9 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.9%), per capita income ($48,116 compared to $45,043, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $95,698, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $40,739, a difference of 0.45%), householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $52,374, a difference of 0.92%), and median earnings ($49,501 compared to $48,041, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.6%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and male poverty (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.49%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.4%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (40.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 0.10%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.8%).