Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Uganda

Excellent
Good
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,063,360 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.952. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.195% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 194.8 Immigrants from Uganda.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $45,043, a difference of 14.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $95,698, a difference of 11.7%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $56,064, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,374, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $40,739, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $61,976, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
24.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.38%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Average
11.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.0%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.3%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%