Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Uganda

Fair
Good
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,789,510 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 10.6 Immigrants from Uganda.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $103,584, a difference of 25.9%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $106,188, a difference of 25.2%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $87,553, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $52,374, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,976, a difference of 16.8%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Excellent
24.9%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.7%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Average
11.9%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.7%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.9%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.61%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Excellent
30.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.6%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 56.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.1%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.17%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%