Austrian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,886,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.692% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 692.0 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,116 compared to $38,065, a difference of 26.4%), median family income ($111,306 compared to $88,267, a difference of 26.1%), and median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $47,482, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $53,266, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $36,023, a difference of 13.6%), and median earnings ($49,501 compared to $41,737, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 72.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 65.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.8%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.5%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.4%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (64.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.7%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.4%).