Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,136,117 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.386% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 386.5 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $38,065, a difference of 37.2%), median family income ($115,847 compared to $88,267, a difference of 31.2%), and median male earnings ($61,628 compared to $47,482, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $53,266, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $36,023, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 71.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 54.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.5%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.4%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 76.6%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 64.8%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).