Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,300,873 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 33.8 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $38,065, a difference of 43.3%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $88,267, a difference of 36.0%), and median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $47,482, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $53,266, a difference of 1.0%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $36,023, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 71.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.28%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (46.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 110.7%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 82.4%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.21%).