Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,170,845 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 17.0 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.7%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $88,267, a difference of 17.0%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $47,482, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $53,266, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $36,023, a difference of 7.5%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $76,784, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 68.1%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 67.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.1%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 32.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.3%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.1%), family households (64.6% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 89.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.8%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.9%).