Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Latvia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Latvia
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,260,353 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.341% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 341.1 Immigrants from Latvia.
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,914, a difference of 66.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,454, a difference of 51.9%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $114,826, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,737, a difference of 0.45%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,099, a difference of 22.0%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 26.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $50,914 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $114,826 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $93,602 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $51,555 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $61,422 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $43,099 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Fair $51,737 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $105,522 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $111,454 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $64,298 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 152.9%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 133.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 6.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 39.5%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 164.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 118.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 115.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Good 5.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 116.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 76.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 25.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 52.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 106.0%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 94.6%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 70.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 52.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 78.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.8%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Latvia |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |