Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Latvia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Latvia
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,704,366 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.261% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 261.2 Immigrants from Latvia.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,737, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $64,298, a difference of 3.2%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $111,454, a difference of 0.41%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $43,099, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $114,826, a difference of 1.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Exceptional $50,914 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Exceptional $114,826 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $93,602 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Exceptional $51,555 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Exceptional $61,422 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Exceptional $43,099 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Fair $51,737 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Exceptional $105,522 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Exceptional $111,454 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Exceptional $64,298 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Fair 20.4% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Good 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Average 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Average 65.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Exceptional 80.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Good 36.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.2%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.26%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 62.0% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Fair 46.0% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 52.2% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.4% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.7%), bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.6% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Exceptional 88.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Exceptional 70.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Exceptional 52.8% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.8%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.35%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Average 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 21.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.2% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Good 17.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 6.0% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |