Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Latvia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Latvia
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,037,584 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Immigrants from Latvia.
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $50,914, a difference of 36.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $105,522, a difference of 30.5%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $114,826, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,737, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $64,298, a difference of 18.8%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $50,914 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Exceptional $114,826 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Exceptional $93,602 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Exceptional $51,555 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Exceptional $61,422 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Exceptional $43,099 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Fair $51,737 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Exceptional $105,522 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Exceptional $111,454 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Exceptional $64,298 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.2%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 62.0% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 25.9% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 56.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 88.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Tragic 52.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 77.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 70.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Exceptional 52.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Latvia |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |