Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Apache
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Apache

Immigrants from Latvia

Poor
Excellent
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Apache Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,695,876 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 8.074% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 8,074.5 Immigrants from Latvia.
Apache Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,886 compared to $50,914, a difference of 46.0%), median family income ($84,451 compared to $114,826, a difference of 36.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $111,454, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $51,737, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $64,298, a difference of 17.6%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,886
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,451
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,927
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,388
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,429
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,895
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,395
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,260
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,184
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,668
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Tragic
26.7%

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 98.6%), family poverty (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 87.4%), and receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 76.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.2%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.6%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.3%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
10.3%

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 89.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 80.9%), and male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Good
5.4%

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 7.2%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.7%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.6%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (66.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.46
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
29.1%

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.7%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.5%

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 73.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 64.7%), and bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.0%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.8%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.5%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and female disability (13.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.8%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricApacheImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.0%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
53.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%