Immigrants from Syria vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,718,444 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to a decrease of 34.6 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,218 compared to $53,359, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,789 compared to $112,228, a difference of 16.0%), and median family income ($106,118 compared to $122,764, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $55,932, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($40,499 compared to $45,323, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.99%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.9%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (16.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.8%).