Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,845,782 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 66.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $53,359, a difference of 6.9%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $65,518, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $54,938, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($100,151 compared to $100,711, a difference of 0.56%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $118,498, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $55,932, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.040%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.3%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.0%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.9%).