Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,639,437 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 59.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $53,359, a difference of 18.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $112,228, a difference of 15.5%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $65,518, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $55,932, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $45,323, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.80%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (47.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.9%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.2%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%).