Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,430,488 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 62.8 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $55,932, a difference of 6.3%), median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $45,323, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($53,186 compared to $54,938, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($53,799 compared to $53,359, a difference of 0.82%), median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $65,518, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $69,774, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.0%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.2%), bachelor's degree (45.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and associate's degree (53.1% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.0%).