Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sioux

Immigrants from Guatemala

Fair
Poor
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Sioux Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,691,518 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $51,447, a difference of 10.8%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $75,123, a difference of 10.8%), and per capita income ($33,921 compared to $37,550, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $35,444, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($45,566 compared to $46,244, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $53,950, a difference of 2.7%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
Income MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,921
Tragic
$37,550
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,386
Tragic
$87,191
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,792
Tragic
$75,123
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,448
Tragic
$40,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,566
Tragic
$46,244
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,063
Tragic
$35,444
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,417
Poor
$51,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,089
Tragic
$81,341
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,750
Tragic
$86,573
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,509
Tragic
$53,950
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
22.5%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (22.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 61.4%), single father poverty (23.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
Poverty MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
Poverty
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.6%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Males
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
24.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.9%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.8%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
15.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.6%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 62.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.6%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Good
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
8.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.4%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.7%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.2%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
81.1%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (41.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
42.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.52
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Tragic
37.5%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.8%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.8%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 102.1%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.5% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
Education Level MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
95.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
94.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
93.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
91.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
90.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
89.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
87.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
85.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
84.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
81.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
77.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.4%
Tragic
56.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.0%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
38.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
30.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
Disability MetricSiouxImmigrants from Guatemala
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.7%
Tragic
49.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%