Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Guatemala
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Guatemala
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,182,486 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 8.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,550, a difference of 22.5%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $75,123, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $86,573, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,447, a difference of 0.11%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,444, a difference of 0.33%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $81,341, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $37,550 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $87,191 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $75,123 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $40,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $46,244 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $35,444 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Poor $51,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $81,341 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $86,573 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $53,950 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 58.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 58.6%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.4%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.5% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 21.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 24.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 128.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 101.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Good 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 81.1% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 37.3%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 37.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 69.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 32.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (81.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.31%), 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.6% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 93.9% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 91.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 90.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 89.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 87.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 85.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 84.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 81.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 77.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 56.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 38.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 30.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 50.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.9%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 49.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |